Session 6b | Water and AMD management / Commingling of tailings and coarse wastes / Importance of site climatic, topographic, seismic and social settings
Stream B
Friday, July 14, 2023 |
10:30 AM - 12:10 PM |
Boulevard Room |
Sponsored By:
|
Speaker
Mr Johan Fourie
Senior Hydrogeochemist
KCB Australia
Multiphase gas flow model of the geomembrane covered buttress to inform hydrogeochemical TSF design
10:30 AM - 10:40 AMAbstract / Presentation Overview
Gas modelling was completed to inform stability upgrade designs for a tailings storage facility (TSF). Significant iron-rich precipitates have been accumulating at the toe of a 40+ year-old tailings storage facility (TSF). From a geotechnical perspective, the concern is that precipitation at the toe result in increased piezometric levels in the dam, which might compromise the long-term dam stability. A buttress with an integrated High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE) geomembrane liner above the drain elevation is being designed, which would limit the ingress of oxygen. The aim of this design is that reduced mineral precipitation will prevent the further rise of piezometric levels in the dam.
A 2D gas model was constructed to model the performance of the liner to limit oxygen ingress with cognisance of the buttress geometry. The following critical aspects were required for the modelling of the gas migration into the proposed sealed buttress:
• The Oxygen Consumption Rate (OCR) of the buttress waste rock.
• The Oxygen Diffusion Coefficient (ODC) of the HDPE liner.
• The degree of saturation in the layers overlying the HDPE.
The gas modelling indicated that below the liner, the air phase reaches sub-oxic conditions within a couple of years. Saturated parts of the buttress reach sub-oxic conditions within a couple of months as gas diffusion into the water phase is too slow to keep up with the consumption of oxygen.
It is anticipated that the sub-oxic conditions will create a geochemical environment that would not favour mineral precipitation and ideally, may even promote mineral dissolution. The results of the gas modelling were further used in a follow up study in a Reactive Transport Model, to calculate the potential for precipitation in the buttress.
A 2D gas model was constructed to model the performance of the liner to limit oxygen ingress with cognisance of the buttress geometry. The following critical aspects were required for the modelling of the gas migration into the proposed sealed buttress:
• The Oxygen Consumption Rate (OCR) of the buttress waste rock.
• The Oxygen Diffusion Coefficient (ODC) of the HDPE liner.
• The degree of saturation in the layers overlying the HDPE.
The gas modelling indicated that below the liner, the air phase reaches sub-oxic conditions within a couple of years. Saturated parts of the buttress reach sub-oxic conditions within a couple of months as gas diffusion into the water phase is too slow to keep up with the consumption of oxygen.
It is anticipated that the sub-oxic conditions will create a geochemical environment that would not favour mineral precipitation and ideally, may even promote mineral dissolution. The results of the gas modelling were further used in a follow up study in a Reactive Transport Model, to calculate the potential for precipitation in the buttress.
Biography
Johan has 20 years of professional hydrogeological and geochemical experience. His specialisation in geochemistry includes the modelling of mine and wastewater qualities, prediction of acid mine drainage, contaminated land assessment, as well as heat and gas modelling.
Mr Christopher Hogg
Senior Principal
CMW Geosciences Pty Ltd
Considerations in tailings storage expansions in tropical environs
10:40 AM - 10:50 AMAbstract / Presentation Overview
This paper explores the considerations and constraints in the implementation of a tailings storage expansion project in Indonesia. An existing tailings storage is being operated at the site. The existing TSF is a valley fill type storage with upslope catchments. Currently the TSF has a main embankment with a height of around 80 m. The site has a tropical climate with high rainfall exceeding evaporation, and medium to high seismicity.
An options study was conducted to assess the future storage needs for the life-of-mine. This study considered a variety of site options including the existing site. At the time of the study, the site had a mine life nine years with 45 Mt of projected ore production. The existing TSF at the time of the study had 13 Mt of storage capacity. The existing TSF has a consequence rating of ‘High B’ in accordance with ANCOLD (2019), due to potential loss of life at the plant and ‘major’ consequence of an embankment failure.
Five site options were considered for future tailings storage including raising the existing facility and in-pit storage. A ranking of the site options was performed and considered project location/cost, engineering risk, environmental risk and social risk. Each option was scored based on outcomes for the criteria. From these scores the options were ranked under each category. Each category was assumed to have equal weighting. From the ranking of the options for each category, an overall ranking was assessed. Based on the assessment the best ranking, was raising the existing facility however an alternative site which had the next ranking was also investigated. Following investigations it was decided that the option of raising of the existing facility was preferred.
The study concluded that the additional 32 Mt can be stored in the existing TSF by raising the embankment between 20 and 30 m. The paper presents the design adopted and presents a discussion of the design constraints, and design and operational controls adopted.
The project is in the process of being approved by government regulators.
An options study was conducted to assess the future storage needs for the life-of-mine. This study considered a variety of site options including the existing site. At the time of the study, the site had a mine life nine years with 45 Mt of projected ore production. The existing TSF at the time of the study had 13 Mt of storage capacity. The existing TSF has a consequence rating of ‘High B’ in accordance with ANCOLD (2019), due to potential loss of life at the plant and ‘major’ consequence of an embankment failure.
Five site options were considered for future tailings storage including raising the existing facility and in-pit storage. A ranking of the site options was performed and considered project location/cost, engineering risk, environmental risk and social risk. Each option was scored based on outcomes for the criteria. From these scores the options were ranked under each category. Each category was assumed to have equal weighting. From the ranking of the options for each category, an overall ranking was assessed. Based on the assessment the best ranking, was raising the existing facility however an alternative site which had the next ranking was also investigated. Following investigations it was decided that the option of raising of the existing facility was preferred.
The study concluded that the additional 32 Mt can be stored in the existing TSF by raising the embankment between 20 and 30 m. The paper presents the design adopted and presents a discussion of the design constraints, and design and operational controls adopted.
The project is in the process of being approved by government regulators.
Biography
Chris Hogg
Senior Principal - Tailings, CMW Geosciences Pty Ltd
Chris graduated from the University of Western Australia with a Degree of Bachelor of Engineering (Civil) in 1985. He has a wide variety of geotechnical experience with tailings storage facilities (TSF) and mine infrastructure covering a period of around 30 years, including the investigations, design, preparation of construction documentation, construction monitoring and preparation of documentation to meet the Government requirements for a range of tailings storage facilities across a wide range of minerals processing operations including Gold, Iron Ore, Nickel, Base Metals and industrial minerals such as Lithium and mineral sands. Chris’ work in the tailings field includes experience in water management, management strategies and studies. Chris has a wide range of experience, both in Australia and overseas - Indonesia and Africa.
Dr Jianping Li
Principal Geotechnical Engineer
BHP
Co-disposed coal rejects and tailings strengths and existing co-disposal strategies review
10:50 AM - 11:00 AMAbstract / Presentation Overview
The mine discussed in this paper is an open cut coalmine located in Bowen Basin, Queensland. It has been co-disposing mixed plant rejects (MPR) and dewatered tailings (DT) within spoil dumps for over nine years since commencement of operations. MPR is loaded onto trucks at the Coal Handling and Processing Plant (CHPP), transported to prestrip waste dumps and then co-disposed on dump bench through either paddock dumping or at active tipheads along with waste truck tipping. DT is disposed in tailings cells constructed in prestrip truck dumps due to wet weather events and other operational constraints, and then capped with spoil. Physical and mechanical properties, including total moisture contents, densities and shear strengths of the co-disposed MPR and DT, were unknown until the Closure Planning team, Principal Environmental Geochemist, organised a study program to assess geochemical properties on in situ waste. As part of the program, the geotechnical team collected MPR and DT samples from sonic core drilling, which were then sent to the University of Newcastle for laboratory testing. This paper presents the findings from sonic core drilling and laboratory geotechnical testing, and validating and optimising outcomes from reviewing of the existing co-disposal strategies at the mine through dump stability modelling and by using the shear strength results from triaxial compression testing conducted on the samples collected during the fieldwork.
Biography
Dr Jianping Li has over 30 years of mining engineering and rock mechanics experience – in open-pit and underground hard rock mining – achieved through working in research organisations and mining industries in Australia and China. He co-developed the Acoustic Emission (AE) technique for in situ stress measurement at the WA School of Mines. He co-authored 27 papers in the areas of rock mechanics, open-pit and underground mining geotechnical engineering, AE in situ stress measurement, mine backfill and blasting. He is an AusIMM Fellow, chartered and registered professional. He is now a Principal Geotechnical Engineer for BHP Coal.
Mr Mike Liu
Senior Water Engineer
Red Earth Engineering
Calibration of the water balance model for an inactive tailings storage facility using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery
11:00 AM - 11:10 AMAbstract / Presentation Overview
Calibration of a water balance model usually requires measured pond water levels of sufficient duration and frequency. However, such data is not always available for tailings storage facilities, especially for inactive facilities. Satellite remote sensing products may be used as the alternative data set in water balance model calibration when in situ monitoring data is not available. This paper presents the water balance model calibration case study for an inactive tailings storage facility located in Northern Australia. The calibration used the Sentinel-2 open-access remote sensing data which provides high-resolution historical satellite imageries captured every five days for the study site. The historical satellite imageries were used to develop a long-term historical supernatant pond level record for the facility. The process involves using the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) to calculate the supernatant pond size and shape. The identified pond boundary was then converted to a pond water level using the available topographic survey of the tailings beach. This approach developed a three year historical pond water level record which was then used for calibration of the water balance model. The calibrated water balance model was used to conduct a probabilistic water balance assessment which established a more reliable facility flood risk profile for both the dam owner and the local authority. This case study reveals the potential application of the Sentinel-2 Satellite remote sensing data set for the calibration of tailings storage facility water balance models. The paper also discussed the precondition and limitations of this application.
Biography
Mike is a professional Water Engineer with extensive experience with tailings dam and mine site water management. Mike has led the water management design and studies for various tailings dam projects located in NT, QLD, and WA of Australia. His expertise lies in hydrological and hydraulic modeling, design of drainage structures, water balance modeling, dam-break study, and consequence category assessment. Mike is a high-end user of a number of hydro-technical software packages including XP RAFTS, RORB, HEC-HMS, TUFLOW, FLO2D, HEC-RAS, and GoldSim, etc. He is also an expert user of QGIS software.
Mr David Brett
Senior Technical Director
GHD
Q&A with Session Chair
11:10 AM - 11:25 AMBiography
David is a civil/geotechnical engineer with a Master of Engineering degree from University of Tasmania and a wide experience in investigation, design and construction of engineering projects including several projects awarded engineering excellence awards. His experience includes over 40 years involvement with mine waste disposal covering tailings from a wide range of mine types and properties and dam construction methods, together with waste rock dump design for potentially acid forming wastes. David is passionate about designing for closure.
As convenor of the committee responsible for producing the 2012/2019 ANCOLD Guidelines on Tailings Dams and Australian representative on the ICOLD Sub-committee on Tailings and Mine Dams, David is very much involved in assisting the mining industry in tailings management through the challenges of the future.
Silvia Mancini
Senior Principal
Geosyntec Consultants
Alternative treatment and management of mine influenced water
11:25 AM - 11:35 AMAbstract / Presentation Overview
Mining companies are increasingly challenged with water treatment obligations that may endure in- perpetuity. Methods for conventional treatment of mine effluent is costly and, in some cases, ineffective at meeting environmental water quality objectives. Due to these challenges, mining companies are undergoing a transformation from providing conventional to innovative environmental management solutions; implemented during initial mine planning through source control and water management, to operational and post closure water treatment and reclamation. Technologies that manage and treat mine influenced water through stimulation of biogeochemical processes support this transformation, and may minimise compliance issues and operational requirements, and assist in meeting sustainability goals. This presentation will present case studies to exhibit the development, design and implementation of alternative technologies that have been successfully applied at mine sites for the treatment and management of mine influenced water. Applications of technologies including in situ and ex situ treatment reactors such as Gravel Bed Reactors™ and bioreactors, phytotechnologies, constructed and engineered wetlands, pit lake in-pit treatment, and permeable reactive barriers will be presented. The deployment of mobile treatment systems to mine sites, such as containerised treatment pilot systems, will be discussed as an important stage to facilitate treatability studies, regulatory approval, and advancement of technology application to full- scale. Advantages of using alternative water treatment and management tools will be presented along with new challenges and opportunities to apply these technologies at Australian mine sites.
Biography
Dr. Mancini obtained her PhD from the University of Toronto focusing on using Compound Specific Isotope Analysis (CSIA) as an environmental forensics and diagnostic tool to evaluate sources and biodegradation of organic contaminants in groundwater systems. Silvia is a Senior Principal with over 15 years of consulting experience in water treatment for mining, oil and gas and manufacturing industries. As a mining practice leader in Geosyntec’s global operations, she provides project direction and senior support to mining projects. Her focus in the mining sector is on biotreatment options of metals and metalloids, and the use of innovative, cost effective technologies. Silvia continues to be active in research and development of innovative technologies and cost effective water treatment options through her Adjunct Professorship at the University of Toronto (Earth Sciences).
James Penman
Senior Geotechnical Engineer
KCB Australia
Use of multi-criteria alternatives assessment for TSF option selection: Lessons learned from recent applications
11:35 AM - 11:45 AMAbstract / Presentation Overview
The Global Industry Standard on Tailings Management (GISTM; Global Tailings Review (GTR), 2020) requires the use of a multi-criteria alternatives assessment (MAA) for a new TSF with the goal to select an alternative that: (1) minimises risks to people and the environment throughout the tailings facility life cycle; and (2) minimises the volume of tailings and water placed in external tailings facilities. The use of TSF alternatives trade-off studies in one form or another is well-established; however, in the context of GISTM roll-out, the widespread application of the often more rigorous MAA process is a significant emerging trend in tailings management.
Application of the MAA process can be a complex undertaking with requirement for engagement with stakeholders from technical and non-technical backgrounds, and consideration for a broad range of alternatives including tailings dewatering and alternative disposal methods such as commingling waste. This paper provides an overview of applying the MAA process and lessons learned from six recent applications of the MAA process covering a diverse range of ranging of commodities (coal, copper, gold, iron ore, and poly-metallic), project statuses (proposed, operational, and closed), and locations (Australia, Africa, and the Americas).
The typical MAA process applied in the reference projects included confirmation of the ‘must haves’ (or design basis), the ‘can’t haves’ (or exclusions/‘fatal flaws’), and ‘nice-to-haves’ (or objectives) for identification and assessment of TSF alternatives. The nice-to-haves/objectives are the foundation for the MAA framework and, in line with guidance provided from Environment Canada (Environment Canada, 2013), these were typically grouped under a set of ‘accounts’ covering technical, environmental, and social (or socio-economic) considerations alongside project economics. The comparison of MAA frameworks from the reference projects provides useful insights into commonalities between projects as well as the site-specific objectives driven by nuances in the site’s physical (climate, topography, geology etc) and social settings.
Application of the MAA process can be a complex undertaking with requirement for engagement with stakeholders from technical and non-technical backgrounds, and consideration for a broad range of alternatives including tailings dewatering and alternative disposal methods such as commingling waste. This paper provides an overview of applying the MAA process and lessons learned from six recent applications of the MAA process covering a diverse range of ranging of commodities (coal, copper, gold, iron ore, and poly-metallic), project statuses (proposed, operational, and closed), and locations (Australia, Africa, and the Americas).
The typical MAA process applied in the reference projects included confirmation of the ‘must haves’ (or design basis), the ‘can’t haves’ (or exclusions/‘fatal flaws’), and ‘nice-to-haves’ (or objectives) for identification and assessment of TSF alternatives. The nice-to-haves/objectives are the foundation for the MAA framework and, in line with guidance provided from Environment Canada (Environment Canada, 2013), these were typically grouped under a set of ‘accounts’ covering technical, environmental, and social (or socio-economic) considerations alongside project economics. The comparison of MAA frameworks from the reference projects provides useful insights into commonalities between projects as well as the site-specific objectives driven by nuances in the site’s physical (climate, topography, geology etc) and social settings.
Biography
James is a civil-geotechnical engineer with over 14 years of dedicated experience in the planning, design, construction, operation and closure of tailings storage facilities and mine water dams across Australia, Africa, Noth America, South America, and the Indo-Pacific. James has recent, extensive experience in the development and assessment of tailings storage facility risk, governance and assurance systems for major global mining houses. This experience includes risk and assurance reviews for over 50 tailings storage facilities and mine water dams throughout the world. James has facilitated several multi-criteria alternatives assessments for new tailings facilities associated with greenfield and brownfield projects located in Australia and Africa.
Ajitha Wanninayake
Technical Director
GHD
Feasibility study of co-disposal of tailings and mine waste rock
11:45 AM - 11:55 AMAbstract / Presentation Overview
Alternative tailings disposal methods have gained much attention due to their advantages over conventional slurry tailings storage facilities. Co-disposal of tailings and mine waste rock is one of the leading methods of alternative disposal methods. However, application of this technology has been mostly limited to small-scale and research projects until recently. This paper discusses the use of co-disposal technology in a large-scale mining project in Western Australia.
An options assessment was performed to evaluate alternative tailings disposal methods against conventional slurry deposition, and co-disposal of tailings and mine waste rock was selected as the preferred option for tailings management. A feasibility study was completed for the selected co- disposal option that involved co-mingling of tailings with mine waste rock and construction of alternating layers of waste rock and tailings. Geotechnical and geochemical characteristics of tailings and waste rock, site topography and subsurface conditions, climatic conditions, construction and operational benefits, life cycle costs and safety in design were evaluated during the study.
Suitable mixing ratios of waste rock and tailings were assessed relative to the mine waste production schedule to maintain rock to rock contact ensuring improved static and dynamic stability of the co- disposal facility. Containment of potentially acid forming waste rock was incorporated in the design by including tailings in the waste rock dump.
Preliminary designs were completed for the co-disposal waste rock dump facility and slope stability and deformation analyses were performed for the design. The co-disposal facility will be developed to a detailed design during the next phase of the project.
An options assessment was performed to evaluate alternative tailings disposal methods against conventional slurry deposition, and co-disposal of tailings and mine waste rock was selected as the preferred option for tailings management. A feasibility study was completed for the selected co- disposal option that involved co-mingling of tailings with mine waste rock and construction of alternating layers of waste rock and tailings. Geotechnical and geochemical characteristics of tailings and waste rock, site topography and subsurface conditions, climatic conditions, construction and operational benefits, life cycle costs and safety in design were evaluated during the study.
Suitable mixing ratios of waste rock and tailings were assessed relative to the mine waste production schedule to maintain rock to rock contact ensuring improved static and dynamic stability of the co- disposal facility. Containment of potentially acid forming waste rock was incorporated in the design by including tailings in the waste rock dump.
Preliminary designs were completed for the co-disposal waste rock dump facility and slope stability and deformation analyses were performed for the design. The co-disposal facility will be developed to a detailed design during the next phase of the project.
Biography
Ajitha Wanninayake is a Technical Director at GHD and a Chartered Professional Engineer with over 27 years of experience. He holds an honours bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering from the University of Peradeniya and a Master’s degree in Geotechnical Engineering from Saitama University.
He has worked on numerous major mining, geotechnical, civil and transport infrastructure development projects as a principal/lead geotechnical engineer and a project manager. Ajitha is experienced in completing conceptual and feasibility studies, preliminary and detailed engineering designs, and has developed many safe, cost-effective, and sustainable engineering designs. He specialises in design, construction, operation, and closure of tailings and water storage facilities. Ajitha has worked with and managed multi-disciplinary project teams and achieved project goals for both government and private clients. He has worked and performed research internationally including in Australia, America and Asia. Ajitha has been an instructor at the Association of State Dam Safety Officials (ASDSO), USA.
Mr David Brett
Senior Technical Director
GHD
Q&A with Session Chair
11:55 AM - 12:10 PMBiography
David is a civil/geotechnical engineer with a Master of Engineering degree from University of Tasmania and a wide experience in investigation, design and construction of engineering projects including several projects awarded engineering excellence awards. His experience includes over 40 years involvement with mine waste disposal covering tailings from a wide range of mine types and properties and dam construction methods, together with waste rock dump design for potentially acid forming wastes. David is passionate about designing for closure.
As convenor of the committee responsible for producing the 2012/2019 ANCOLD Guidelines on Tailings Dams and Australian representative on the ICOLD Sub-committee on Tailings and Mine Dams, David is very much involved in assisting the mining industry in tailings management through the challenges of the future.
Session Chair
David Brett
Senior Technical Director
GHD